home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
articles & treatises
oral arguments
news
appellate courts
search
contact
 
Mayer Brown’s more than 60 appellate lawyers have argued over 200 cases before the United States Supreme Court, representing either parties or amici in approximately 15 cases each Term for the past several years, and arguing an average of four per Term. In addition, lawyers in the practice have argued over 500 cases in other appellate courts throughout the nation, including in every federal court of appeals and in the appellate or supreme courts of a majority of the states.
Spotlights
Clients interviewed by Legal 500 US call Mayer Brown an "analytical powerhouse" and "praise the practice for being 'unbelievably responsive and client-oriented,' and for 'advancing reasonable business interests.'"
Chambers USA observes that our “broad assembly of talented advocates is well known for its sophisticated work across a range of areas and disciplines, including securities, antitrust, IP, environmental and tax."
Legal 500 US reports that "Six of the Supreme Court cases that the firm took on in 2008 were distributed between four of the firm's lawyers, which demonstrates an egalitarian policy and depth of bench within the practice that contrasts with the 'star-centric' status quo in some Supreme Court practices."
Clients expressed to Legal 500 2009 that Mayer Brown's Supreme Court and Appellate attorneys are "master strategists," and the "best at what they do - high-quality appeals'."

Chambers USA and Legal 500 US have again recognized our Supreme Court & Appellate group's preeminence in the field: for the third year in a row, both  Chambers USA and Legal 500 US rank us as a top tier practice, with Chambers noting that our "heavyweight appellate team...is widely regarded as one of the best in the USA." The publications' comments illustrate Mayer Brown's dominance in the field of appellate advocacy.

Also, for the third year in a row, the National Law Journal named Mayer Brown to its "Appellate Hot List," recognizing firms that practice "exemplary, cutting-edge appellate advocacy."

Here, we have collected information and links relevant to Supreme Court and appellate practice, as well as information about our attorneys and the cases we have handled in recent years. We hope you enjoy exploring the site.

Mayer Brown In The News
After the Argument: Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.
Mayer Brown’s Supreme Court & Appellate practice is pleased to present “After the Argument: Assessing US Supreme Court Business Cases.” In this video series, we discuss the oral arguments in some of the important business cases currently pending before the US Supreme Court this Term. Each edition will include a summary of the questions presented to the Court, a recap of the oral argument (including questions asked and the tone of the Justices), and a discussion of how a decision might affect businesses. Read >>
HTML DocumentLITIGATIONWeek: This Week in California Litigation
California’s impact on national and even global business reaches far beyond its state line. Whether you are based in California, have operations here or do business in the state, regulatory and judicial decisions made here can affect your business significantly. Read >>
HTML DocumentMayer Brown’s Supreme Court & Appellate practice
named to The National Law Journal’s “Appellate Hot List”
for fourth consecutive year

18 April 2011 – Mayer Brown, a leading global law firm, announced today that its Supreme Court & Appellate practice has been named as one of the best in the country by a leading legal publication. Read >>
[ More News ]   
After the Argument: Assessing US Supreme Court Business Cases

Mayer Brown’s Supreme Court & Appellate practice is pleased to present “After the Argument: Assessing US Supreme Court Business Cases.” In this video series, we will discuss the oral arguments in some of the important business cases currently pending before the US Supreme Court this Term. Each edition will include a summary of the questions presented to the Court, a recap of the oral argument (including questions asked and the tone of the Justices), and a discussion of how a decision might affect businesses.
Video Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes – Kevin Ranlett, March 31, 2011
Video Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics – Dan Himmelfarb, October 14, 2010
Video Bruesewitz v. Wyeth – David Gossett, October 14, 2010

Federal Appellate Practice

Over two dozen members of the Supreme Court & Appellate practice worked together to author Federal Appellate Practice, which publisher BNA Books describes as “[a] practical manual on handling federal appellate matters, especially civil appeals and cases involving review of federaladministrative agencies.” The result is a very impressive volume, which practitioners will greatly appreciate. It makes a perfect companion to Supreme Court Practice, highlighted below and also published by BNA Books, for which several partners at the firm have been responsible for many years.

To view the table of contents or find out more information on the treatise, please click here.

To coincide with the launch of the book, our Supreme Court & Appellate hosted a teleconference series focusing on topics of interest to counsel dealing with appeals in the federal courts. Please click below to access recordings for each of the events:

Audio Amicus Curiae Briefs Audio Review of Administrative Agency Decisions
Audio Effective Brief Writing Audio Considering Supreme Court Review
Audio Presenting Your Oral Argument Audio Appellate Procedure in The Federal Circuit
Audio Preserving Issues on Appeal
 
Recent Oral Arguments
Mayer Brown's Supreme Court and Appellate Practice group has a depth and breadth of Supreme Court experience without equal in the private bar.  To see and listen to representative recent arguments by the members of the group, please visit our oral arguments page. To see a complete list of the 222 cases our lawyers have argued in the Supreme Court, click here.
 
Recent Briefs
We file hundreds of briefs in the Supreme Court and other federal and state courts of appeals a year.  We post a wide selection of these briefs on this site.  Briefs, sorted by case name, subject matter, court, or attorney, can be viewed here.
 
Recent Articles
Our lawyers frequently write articles on important appellate decisions, Supreme Court and appellate practice, and other topics.  To read a variety of recent articles by our lawyers, click here.
 
Focus On The Supreme Court

Mayer Brown boasts one of the premier Supreme Court practices in the country.  The following are some resources about the Supreme Court.
 
Supreme Court Docket Reports
2010 Term, March 7, 2011

Mayer Brown prepares a newsletter describing all cases of interest to the business community in which the Supreme Court grants certiorari. The most recent docket report, issued March 7, 2011, discusses the following cases in which the Court granted certiorari:

This docket report is available here.
All other docket reports from the last several years are available here.
Click here to request email delivery of future docket reports.


Decision Alert - March 29, 2011
The Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.
Supreme Court Reference Material
The following are some useful charts and Mayer Brown publications on the Supreme Court and Supreme Court practice:

PDF Status of Cases Argued during the current Term 
PDF Supreme Court Cases Handled By Mayer Brown Attorneys - 2010 Term 
[ Final reports for term: 2009200820072006 2005200420032002200120001999 ]
HTML Document List of Cases Argued in the Supreme Court by Mayer Brown Attorneys
PDF Mayer Brown in the Supreme Court of the United States: A Brief History
Supreme Court Practice Treatise
With three current members of Mayer Brown's appellate litigation group among its coauthors, the leading treatise on Supreme Court litigation -- Supreme Court Practice by Eugene Gressman, Stephen M. Shapiro, Kenneth S. Geller, Timothy S. Bishop, and Edward A. Hartnett -- is written from the authors' firsthand knowledge and experience. A new, ninth edition was released in December 2007 incorporating changes in practice resulting from the Court's new rules, which became effective October 1, 2007. The preface and table of contents are available on this site. To order the book from its publisher, BNA, click here.

Book Reviews
Click here to read the review of the ninth edition that originally appeared in the February 11, 2008 issue of Legal Times
Click here to read the review of the eight edition that originally appeared in the Summer 2002 issue of The Appellate Practice Journal
Click here to read the review of the eight edition that appeared in the Autumn 2002 issue of The Green Bag

The Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic

In addition to their duties at Mayer Brown, Andy Pincus and Charles Rothfeld helped found and are co-directors of the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic. The clinic provides clients with the highest quality pro bono representation before the United States Supreme Court, and is in addition to Mayer Brown's other pro bono efforts in the Supreme Court. More information about the Clinic is available at its web site.
 
The Oyez Project

Northwestern University's Oyez Project is a multimedia site with information on the Supreme Court and online recordings of most recent Supreme Court arguments.  Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of the Oyez Project.
 
 
© 2011. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.